2002

John Brockman
[4.22.02]
Rodney Brooks
[6.5.02]
Edge Seminar
Rebooting Civilization II

[8.5..02]
Alan Guth
[11.21..02]
David Haig
[10.24.02]
Gerald Holton
[2.4.02]
Stephen M. Kosslyn
[7.15.02]
Ray Kurzweil
[3.25.02]
Ray Kurzweil
[11.7.02]
Seth Lloyd
[10.24.02]
Katinka Matson
[1.14.02]
Katinka Matson
[6.5.02]
Marvin Minsky
[11.7.02]
Toby Mundy
[10.24.02]
James J. O'Donnell
[6.5.02]
Martin Rees
[12.15.02]
Howard Rheingold
[6.5.02]
Richard M. Smith
[10.24.02]
Lee Smolin
[11.13.02]
Paul Steinhardt
[11.21.02]
Summer Postcards
[8.5.02]
Richard Wrangham
[2.28.02]
The World Question Center - 2002
[1.14.02]

FORTY FLOWERS By Katinka Matson [1.14.02]

New technologies=new perceptions. For the past several years she has experimented with non-photographic techniques for creating images by utilizing input through a flatbed CCD scanner. (No photographs are employed in the process.) This presentation on Edge is the first public showing of this work.

THE WORLD QUESTION CENTER — 2002 [1.14.02]
"I can repeat the question, but am I bright enough to ask it?"

"WHAT IS YOUR QUESTION? ... WHY?"


The 5th Annual Edge Question reflects the spirit of the Edge motto: "To arrive at the edge of the world's knowledge, seek out the most complex and sophisticated minds, put them in a room together, and have them ask each other the questions they are asking themselves." The 2002 Edge Question is: "WHAT IS YOUR QUESTION? ... WHY?" I have asked Edge contributors for "hard-edge" questions, derived from empirical results or experience specific to their expertise, that render visible the deeper meanings of our lives, redefine who and what we are. The goal is a series of interrogatives in which "thinking smart prevails over the anaesthesiology of wisdom."

REFLECTIONS ON MODERN TERRORISM [2.4.02]
By Gerald Holton


There has been an historic transition in which Type I terrorism and Type II terrorism are being combined.  Type I terrorism consists of acts by individuals or small groups that aim to impose terror on other individuals and groups, and through them indirectly on their governments.  Type II terrorism is the imposition by a government on groups of local or foreign populations. The new type of terrorism — Type III — is carried out by a substantially larger group of individuals, is aimed directly at a national population, and has all the components for success.  The article deals with how this new terrorism, at very little psychic cost on the perpetrators, disrupts personal and historic memory through large-scale catastrophe organized for that purpose. Type III terrorism is made easier by the ready availability of high-level technology.  Target nations will not have open to them the conventional responses, and will have to devise new, preventive measures.

THE EVOLUTION OF COOKING [2.28.01]
A Talk with Richard Wrangham


One of the great thrusts of behavioral biology for the last three or four decades has been that if you change the conditions that an animal is in, then you change the kind of behavior that is elicited. What the genetic control of behavior means is not that instincts inevitably pop out regardless of circumstances; instead, it is that we are created with a series of emotions that are appropriate for a range of circumstances. The particular set of emotions that pop out will vary within species, but they will also vary with context, and once you know them better, then you can arrange the context... It's much better to anticipate these things, recognize the problem, and design in advance to protect.

THE INTELLIGENT UNIVERSE [3.25.02]
Ray Kurzweil


The universe has been set up in an exquisitely specific way so that evolution could produce the people that are sitting here today and we could use our intelligence to talk about the universe. We see a formidable power in the ability to use our minds and the tools we've created to gather evidence, to use our inferential abilities to develop theories, to test the theories, and to understand the universe at increasingly precise levels.

DANNY HILLIS WINS $1,000,000 DAN DAVID PRIZE [4.22.02]

First Dan David Prize Winners Announced; Individuals and One Institution Selected for Three $1 Million Awards Recognizing Achievements in 'Past, Present or Future'.

THE NEW HUMANISTS  [4.22.02]
By John Brockman

Something radically new is in the air: new ways of understanding physical systems, new ways of thinking about thinking that call into question many of our basic assumptions. A realistic biology of the mind, advances in physics, electricity, genetics, neurobiology, engineering, the chemistry of materials—all are challenging basic assumptions of who and what we are, of what it means to be human. The arts and the sciences are again joining together as one culture, the third culture. Those involved in this effort—scientists, science-based humanities scholars, writers—are at the center of today's intellectual action....They are the new humanists.


Stephen Jay Gould
1942 - 2002

Stephen Jay Gould died on May 20 at his home in New York City. To remember and honor Steve, to think about his ideas, I present "The Pattern of Life's History", Chapter 2 in The Third Culture (Simon & Schuster, 1995). Included in the chapter are commentaries on Steve and his work by many other participants in the book such as Stewart Kauffman, Marvin Minsky, Niles Eldredge, Murray Gell-Mann, Francisco Varela, J. Doyne Farmer, Steven Pinker, Nicholas Humphrey, Brian Goodwin, Steve Jones, George C. Williams, and Daniel C. Dennett.


TWELVE FLOWERS By Katinka Matson
Introduction By Kevin Kelly

When I saw Matson's images I was blown away. Erase from your mind any notion of pixels or any grainy artifact of previous digitalization gear. Instead imagine a painter who could, like Vermeer, capture the quality of light that a camera can, but with the color of paints. That is what a scanner gives you. Now imagine a gifted artist like Matson exploring what the world looks like when it can only see two inches in front of its eye, but with infinite detail! In her flowers one can see every microscopic dew drop, leaf vein, and particle of pollen—in satisfying rich pigmented color. (From the Introduction By Kevin Kelly.)

A MUTUAL, JOINT-STOCK WORLD IN ALL MERIDIANS [6.5.02]
By James J. O'Donnell

It was on the 24th of August, in the year 410 of the common era, that the unthinkable came to pass. A guerrilla army, led by a renegade Roman general named Alaric, who had been brought up in a German-speaking community outside the actual boundaries of the Roman empire, ended years of threats and intimidation by invading the city of Rome itself. For three days they remained, destroying, looting, and killing. The exact loss of life was never known and may have been less than fears of the moment said it was, but the experience was a shattering one nonetheless. It had been 800 years since the last such defeat of the city, 800 years in which Rome had grown to be the greatest city in the world, the envy of the nations, the model for what a great city was like.


BEYOND COMPUTATION [6.5.02]
A Talk with Rodney Brooks

Maybe there's something beyond computation in the sense that we don't understand and we can't describe what's going on inside living systems using computation only. When we build computational models of living systems—such as a self-evolving system or an artificial immunology system—they're not as robust or rich as real living systems. Maybe we're missing something, but what could that something be? 


SMART MOBS [6.5.02] 
Howard Rheingold

The big battle coming over the future of smart mobs concerns media cartels and government agencies are seeking to reimpose the regime of the broadcast era in which the customers of technology will be deprived of the power to create and left only with the power to consume. That power struggle is what the battles over file-sharing, copy protection, regulation of the radio spectrum are about. Are the populations of tomorrow going to be users, like the PC owners and website creators who turned technology to widespread innovation? Or will they be consumers, constrained from innovation and locked into the technology and business models of the most powerful entrenched interests?


WHAT SHAPE ARE A GERMAN SHEPHERD'S EARS? [[7.15.02] 
A Talk with Stephen M. Kosslyn


There is a gigantic project yet to be done that will have the effect of rooting psychology in natural science. Once this is accomplished, you'll be able to go from phenomenology. . . to information processing. . . to the brain. . . down through the workings of the neurons, including the biochemistry, all the way to the biophysics and the way that genes are up-regulated and down-regulated...This is going to happen; I have no doubt at all. When it does we’re going to have a much better understanding of human nature than is otherwise going to be possible.

REBOOTING CIVILIZATION II
A Edge Event


On July 21, Edge held an event at Eastover Farm which included the physicists Seth Lloyd, Paul Steinhardt, and Alan Guth, computer scientist Marvin Minsky, and technologist Ray Kurzweil. This year, I noted there are a lot of "universes" floating around. Seth Lloyd: the computational universe (or, if you prefer, the it and bit-itty bitty-universe); Paul Steinhardt: the cyclic universe; Alan Guth: the inflationary universe; Marvin Minsky: the emotion universe; Ray Kurzweil: the intelligent universe.


A BIOLOGICAL UNDERSTANDING OF HUMAN NATURE [9.9.02] 
A Talk with Steven Pinker


The main question is: "Why are empirical questions about how the mind works so weighted down with political and moral and emotional baggage? Why do people believe that there are dangerous implications to the idea that the mind is a product of the brain, that the brain is organized in part by the genome, and that the genome was shaped by natural selection?" This idea has been met with demonstrations, denunciations, picketings, and comparisons to Nazism, both from the right and from the left. And these reactions affect both the day-to-day conduct of science and the public appreciation of the science. By exploring the political and moral colorings of discoveries about what makes us tick, we can have a more honest science and a less fearful intellectual milieu.

10 THINGS YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT SECURITY, PRIVACY AND ENCRYPTION [10.24.02] 
A Talk with Richard M. Smith


Until the '60s, governments were not really involved in car design. Then people like Ralph Nader started noticing that a lot of people were being killed in cars and made it clear why this was happening. We have spent the last 35 years or so designing safety into cars, and it's had a pretty dramatic effect. . . We're in that same era now with security on computer systems. We know we have a problem and now we need to focus on design.

GENOMIC IMPRINTING [10.24.02] 
A Talk with David Haig


The area to which I've given the greatest attention is a new phenomenon in molecular biology called genomic imprinting, which is a situation in which a DNA sequence can have conditional behavior depending on whether it is maternally inherited—coming from an egg—or paternally inherited—coming through a sperm. The phenomenon is called imprinting because the basic idea is that there is some imprint that is put on the DNA in the mother's ovary or in the father's testes which marks that DNA as being maternal or paternal, and influences its pattern of expression—what the gene does in the next generation in both male and female offspring.

GOOD BOOKS  [10.24.02] 
Toby Mundy

Doomsayers persist in the belief that the book world has been overrun by philistinism. They are wrong. Publishers can rejoice in unprecedented levels of both quality and quantity. We are living in a golden age of the book.

THE COMPUTATIONAL UNIVERSE [10.24.02] 
Seth Lloyd


Every physical system registers information, and just by evolving in time, by doing its thing, it changes that information, transforms that information, or, if you like, processes that information. Since I've been building quantum computers I've come around to thinking about the world in terms of how it processes information.

THE EMOTION UNIVERSE: MARVIN MINSKY [11.7.02]
A Talk with Marvin Minsky

My goal is making machines that can think-by understanding how people think. One reason why we find this hard to do is because our old ideas about psychology are mostly wrong.

THE INTELLIGENT UNIVERSE [11.7.02] 
Ray Kurzweil


The universe has been set up in an exquisitely specific way so that evolution could produce the people that are sitting here today and we could use our intelligence to talk about the universe. We see a formidable power in the ability to use our minds and the tools we've created to gather evidence, to use our inferential abilities to develop theories, to test the theories, and to understand the universe at increasingly precise levels.

PER BAK 1948–2002 [11.13.02] 
A Rememberance By Lee Smolin


Per Bak died on October 16, 2002, at the age of 54. Per was one of the founders and most influential contributors to the study of complex systems. Per made many contributions to science, but the best known was a general theory of self-organization, which he called, "self-organized criticality".

THE CYCLIC UNIVERSE [11.21.02] 
Paul Steinhardt


I...in the last year I've been involved in the development of an alternative theory that turns the cosmic history topsy-turvy. All the events that created the important /archive/archive_ of our universe occur in a different order, by different physics, at different times, over different time scales—and yet this model seems capable of reproducing all of the successful predictions of the consensus picture with the same exquisite detail.

THE INFLATIONARY UNIVERSE [11.21.02] 
Alan Guth


Inflationary theory itself is a twist on the conventional Big Bang theory. The shortcoming that inflation is intended to overcome is the basic fact that, although the Big Bang theory is called the Big Bang it is in fact not really a theory of a bang at all; it never was.

THE ULTRA EARLY UNIVERSE [12.15.02]
Martin Rees

The boisterous variety of ideas being discussed—branes, inflation, etc.—makes clear that the issues are fascinating, but also we’re still a long way from the right answer. We’re at the stage where all possibilities should be explored. It’s worthwhile to consider the consequences of even the most flaky ideas, although the chance of any of them actually panning out in the long run is not very high.


2002

John Brockman, Editor and Publisher
Russell Weinberger, Associate Publisher

contact: [email protected]
Copyright © 2005 by
Edge Foundation, Inc
All Rights Reserved.

| Top |