Edge.org
To arrive at the edge of the world's knowledge, seek out the most complex and sophisticated minds, put them in a room together, and have them ask each other the questions they are asking themselves.
Published on Edge.org (https://www.edge.org)

Home > Gene-Editing, Aliens, and More: Experts Identify the Most Exciting Science of 2016

News :

Gene-Editing, Aliens, and More: Experts Identify the Most Exciting Science of 2016

[1.8.16]

Each year, Edge.org editor John Brockman poses a provocative question to a select group of thinkers. For this year’s installment, nearly 200 brainy contributors were asked: “What do you consider the most recent scientific news?” Here’s what they had to say.

As Brockman notes, “We now live in a world in which the rate of change is the biggest change.” Science, therefore, has “become a big story, if not the big story: news that will stay news.” But given the insane amount of science-related news that makes the rounds on a daily basis, it’s not immediately clear which sciency tidbits are the ones we should be focused on. 

Gene-Editing, Aliens, and More: Experts Identify the Most Exciting Science of 2016 [1]

Related Content: 

WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER THE MOST INTERESTING RECENT [SCIENTIFIC] NEWS? WHAT MAKES IT IMPORTANT? [2]

News From: 

Gizmodo [3]
George Dvorsky
Read the full article → [4]
[ Fri. Jan. 8. 2016 ]

Each year, Edge.org [5] editor John Brockman poses a provocative question to a select group of thinkers. For this year’s installment, nearly 200 brainy contributors were asked: “What do you consider the most recent scientific news?” [6] Here’s what they had to say.

As Brockman notes, “We now live in a world in which the rate of change is the biggest change.” Science, therefore, has “become a big story, if not the big story: news that will stay news.” But given the insane amount of science-related news that makes the rounds on a daily basis, it’s not immediately clear which sciency tidbits are the ones we should be focused on. 

To help him parse through this staggering amount of science—and to provide a 50-foot perspective on where we are right now—Brockman recruited some of the biggest names in science, technology, art, and philosophy. Contributors included Martin Rees [7], Steven Pinker [8], Gloria Origgi [9], Freeman Dyson [10], Max Tegmark [11], Judith Rich Harris [12], Peter Gabriel [13], Nina Jablonski [14], Bill Joy [15], Michael Shermer [16], Kevin Kelly [17], Gregory Benford [18], Sean Carroll [19], Frank Tipler [20], Steve Omohundro [21], and many, many others. ...

  • John Brockman, Editor and Publisher
  • Russell Weinberger, Associate Publisher
  • Nina Stegeman, Associate Editor
 
  • Contact Info:[email protected]
  • In the News
  • Get Edge.org by email
 
Edge.org is a nonprofit private operating foundation under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Copyright © 2019 By Edge Foundation, Inc All Rights Reserved.

 


Links:
[1] https://www.edge.org/news/gene-editing-aliens-and-more-experts-identify-the-most-exciting-science-of-2016
[2] https://www.edge.org/annual-question/what-do-you-consider-the-most-interesting-recent-scientific-news-what-makes-it
[3] http://gizmodo.com/
[4] http://bit.ly/1TK88iz
[5] http://edge.org/
[6] http://edge.org/annual-question/what-do-you-consider-the-most-interesting-recent-scientific-news-what-makes-it
[7] http://edge.org/annual-question/2016/response/26665
[8] http://edge.org/annual-question/2016/response/26616
[9] http://edge.org/annual-question/2016/response/26791
[10] http://edge.org/annual-question/2016/response/26738
[11] http://edge.org/annual-question/2016/response/26687
[12] http://edge.org/annual-question/2016/response/26682
[13] http://edge.org/annual-question/2016/response/26632
[14] http://edge.org/annual-question/2016/response/26676
[15] http://edge.org/annual-question/2016/response/26675
[16] http://edge.org/annual-question/2016/response/26624
[17] http://edge.org/annual-question/2016/response/26780
[18] http://edge.org/annual-question/2016/response/26774
[19] http://edge.org/annual-question/2016/response/26611
[20] http://edge.org/annual-question/2016/response/26690
[21] http://edge.org/annual-question/2016/response/26689