About
Features
Editions
Press
Events
Dinner
Question Center
Subscribe

Edge 299—September 3, 2009
(2,688 words)

THE THIRD CULTURE

DARWIN'S INTELLECTUAL LEGACY TO THE 21ST CENTURY

RICHARD DAWKINS & BRIAN ENO @ THE OXFORD PLAYHOUSE

IN THE NEWS

CURRENT TV
Max and Jason Show

TWO CULTURES, THREE OR JUST ONE?
By Bob Row

BEYOND EDGE

Dawkins & Eno, Taleb, Gopnik, Coyne, Randall,
Myers, Carroll, Grayling, Zimmer, Krauss



RICHARD DAWKINS & BRIAN ENO @ THE OXFORD PLAYHOUSE

5pm, Friday September 4th [click here]

[...continue]





MAX JONES AND JASON SILVA TALK UP EDGE ON THEIR CURRENT.TV SHOW MAX & JASON STILL UP ...

 


TWO CULTURES, THREE OR JUST ONE?
2009 August 19

By Bob Row (in Bob Row's Gloria Mundi)

This year marks the 50th anniversary of the conference by C.P. Snow on "The Two Cultures ", the one in which he complained about the hegemony of the "Literary Culture" upon the "Scientific-Empirical Culture". Since then, there are still those who keep on dreaming with the day in which the scientists replace the politicians. Others, like John Brockman, do their day editing and publishing best-sellers of "Pop Science" and promoting from some foundation the advent of a supposed "Third Culture", that of the "Humanist Scientists" who educate the public (by chance those that he manage).

Paraphrasing J.M. Keynes we might say that the scientists who believe themselves free of literary influences are usually slaves of some defunct philosopher. In this case Plato, who dreamed of expelling the poets from his ideal Republic. He too was aspiring to end with the diffusers of myths and replace them by cultivators of the rigorous thought (his, of course).

[...]



DARWIN'S INTELLECTUAL LEGACY TO THE 21ST CENTURY

Speakers: Leda Cosmides, Helena Cronin, Daniel C. Dennett, Nicholas Humphrey, Ian McEwan, Steven Pinker, Matt Ridley, John Tooby, Alvaro Fischer (Program Director)

Date: September 7-8, 2009
Venue: CasaPiedra
Av. San José María Escrivá de Balaguer 5600, Vitacura, Santiago.

ED. NOTE: Edge has been invited by the organizers to attend the Darwin Seminar in Santiago and join the eight speakers (all Edge contributors) on a trip to the "extreme south" including a trip along "The Beagle Channel", named after the ship HMS Beagle which surveyed the coasts of the southern part of South America from 1826 to 1830.


Charles Darwin, on the second trip of HMS Beagle under Captain Robert FitzRoy, wrote in his field notebook in 1833, "many glaciers beryl blue most beautiful contrasted with snow". [...] [...] [...] [...].


From the Program Notes: Our intention is to illuminate and discuss how Darwinian thought influenced the disciplines that focus on the study the individuals (biology, neuroscience, psychology); the individual within their social interactions (anthropology, sociology, economy, political science); and how these concepts pertain, in general, to a moral philosophy.

We wish to explore how, from Darwinian thought, there emerges a vision of what it is to be a human being. And that this vision is fundamental and coherent with the entire body of accumulated scientific knowledge. With reverence for the details of their application, it is the impact of Darwin's ideas that is the reason we are celebrating Darwin's anniversary.

Edge looks forward to publishing video highlights of the trip as part of our celebration the three hundredth edition of Edge, later in September.

JB

PERMALINK


WHY CHILE?

By Alvaro Fischer
(Program Director)

Chile played a very important role in Darwin's life and in his theory's development. This is a fact unknown to many, even in Chile. This role can be illustrated by three excerpts from his life:

To begin with, Darwin's trip around the world in the HMS Beagle (December 1831 – October 1836) was crucial for establishing his theory. The journey's purpose, under Captain Fitz Roy's command, was carrying out hydrographic surveys to improve the existing nautical charts of South America's southern tip, basically Argentinean and Chilean territories. Great Britain, as the ruling world power of the time, required control of the oceans in order to develop its sea trade. As a result of this, Darwin stayed in Chile for approximately one third of the journey's duration, as the expedition's naturalist. He traveled from Tierra del Fuego and the Magellan Strait up through Chiloé, Valdivia, Concepción, Valparaíso and Santiago. He then crossed the Andes Mountains to Mendoza and traveled by land from Valparaíso to Copiapó, among many other places. Also, this is the reason why one third of the chapters of his book "A Naturalist Around the World" are about his travels in Chile. The Beagle's journey allowed Darwin to undergo the profound and extended meditation that led him to his theory of evolution by means of natural selection, and a third of that process took place in Chile.

Secondly, and a little more speculatively, passing through Chile helped him reaffirm the idea, already hovering in his mind, that the world wasn't a static structure, but rather, that it needed to be described in an evolutionary manner. In those days, speaking about biological evolution was bold. The accepted view was that the world had been created according to the Biblical narrative. Although Erasmus, his grandfather, had spoken about evolution decades before, and Lamarck had already developed his own theory, none of them got it right. Biological evolution was only mentioned by isolated individuals, with no solid scientific basis. Their preliminary arguments were not capable of bringing forth a theory. Geology, on the other hand, was the fashionable science. Classic physics had already established its prestige, and geology was a consequence of it. Charles Lyell, the most renowned geologist of the time, spoke about evolution of the earth's crust, based on the evidence of geologic layers observable at a glance. For an Englishman like Darwin, even though Lyell's admirer, the concept of geological evolution was a rather theoretical one. The peaceful and unchanging landscape of the British countryside did not provide for a vivid evolutionary experience.

In opposition to that, while in Chile, on January 19th 1835, Darwin had the unique privilege of watching the Osorno volcano's eruption from Ancud, Chiloé. Then, on February 20th of the same year, he had the chance to verify with his own eyes the effects of the Concepción earthquake, which exposed areas previously submerged. He also observed big glaciers cracking down to the sea, creating immense waves and icebergs. Likewise, in the Andes Mountains, he admired sea fossils, acting as silent witnesses of mountains that were previously under seawater. All of this showed him very graphically the geological evolution that Lyell spoke so much about. Such a vivid, emotional experience, that went beyond intellectual understanding, probably molded in Darwin's mind the idea that geological variation, which Chilean geography exposed him to in all its majesty and magnificence, should go together with biological evolution, when wanting to explain the amazing biodiversity the world showed.

Very possibly, then, Darwin's travels in Chile were a previous solid step on which to mount his evolutionary thinking, relevant in the construction of his later theory.

The third episode that highlights Chile's role in Darwin's theory is rather anecdotal, but not less interesting. It deals with a "Chilean" (a native from the yamana ethnic group) who lived in Tierra del Fuego in those days: Jemmy Button. Captain Fitz Roy had to take over as captain of the HMS Beagle in December 1829. Its former captain, Pringley Stokes, committed suicide because he was deeply depressed, probably due to the area's climatic difficulties that prevented him from carrying out satisfactorily the mission the British Admiralty had entrusted him. Admiral Otway, the British officer with headquarters in Rio de Janeiro and responsible for his country's cartographic missions in that part of the world, appointed the 23 year old young lieutenant Robert Fitz Roy to fulfill Stoke's unfinished task. Otway ignored lieutenant Skyring's wishes to get the job – he was the HMS Beagle's second officer in command – to which he felt was entitled and deserved. In the following months, Fitz Roy discovered two big sounds, hidden in the northern part of the Magellan Strait, which he named Otway Sound and Skyring Sound, recognizing Otway's trust in him and graciously compensating for Skyring's frustration.

Due to the difficulties produced by the heavy storms, Fitz Roy had to make use of his whaler boats. This avoided dangerous sailings of the HMS Beagle along the canals. In one of the missions, the natives of the area stole one of the boats while it was resting on the beach and its occupants were exploring inland. Since it was very important to recover it, Fitz Roy began a pursuit to find the authors of the robbery, during which he took natives as hostages to force them to give out hints of the stolen boat's whereabouts. After one month, he realized it would not be possible to get the whaler boat back, but found that the hostage taking and freeing process had ended with him still holding four yamana hostages on board: Fueguia Basket, Jemmy Button, York Minster and Boat Memory (after the stolen boat), all of them named by the British.

Fitz Roy, an educated and refined aristocrat with a scientific leaning, decided that instead of returning the hostages back to their place of origin, he would convince them to come with him to England instead. He had actually thought of carrying out a social experiment, which consisted in educating the natives in the European way of life, and afterwards bringing them back, where they would be able to "civilize" their fellow natives. Boat Memory died from smallpox shortly after they arrived to England. Fueguia Basket, around 10 or 11 years old, Jemmy Button, around 15 years old and York Minster, around 25 years old, were put under the care and education of acquainted teachers as soon as they arrived in England, by the end of 1830. The whole endeavor was payed by Fitz Roy from his own money. The experiment caused great commotion and interest in the aristocratic social circles Fitz Roy was familiar with, and they were even taken to meet Queen Adelaide. However, after a few months, York Minster began sexual advances on Fueguia, who happened to be quite a charming girl. This caused great anxiety in Fitz Roy, since such a scandal in the Victorian England could defame his reputation, especially considering he had not requested a formal permission from the Admiralty to carry out this experiment in the first place. So, he decided to take the natives back as soon as possible. Hence, he rescheduled the continuation of the unfinished cartographic surveys with the HMS Beagle for that same year, 1831, 3 years ahead of his initial plan. He prepared his departure less than a year after they had gotten back to England. For this new trip, he decided he needed a naturalist on board, to gather the rich scientific information this voyage would generate, and also to serve as an intellectual companion during the long journeys at sea. The fact that Fitz Roy felt the urge of taking these "Chileans" back to their land as soon as possible, sailing much earlier than his original plan called for, was crucial for Darwin, and not some other person, to become the naturalist on board. Had Fitz Roy's original itinerary for 1834-1835 been kept, Darwin may have not been available; he might have been married, or busy with other scientific activities, and thus he would not have sailed on the HMS Beagle. We can speculate that he would not have had the long moments of brooding and observation granted to him by that journey, and thus he may not have formulated his theory of Evolution by means of Natural Selection. Those native Chileans, mainly remembered because Jemmy Button's tragic story has later been told in numerous opportunities, were crucial in the serendipitous Darwin's inclusion in the Beagle's voyage.

Due to these three episodes, of different strength and caliber, Chile became such an important place in Darwin's life, and that is why it is so attractive that our country be the venue of the seminars herein proposed.

___

1. Darwin, C., "The Origin of Species", chapter II

2. The HMS Beagle was 28 meters long, displacing 235 tons.

3. Robert Fitz Roy, was an aristocrat, grandson of the Duque of Grafton and nephew of Lord Castlereagh. He was born on July 5th, 1805 (the year the Battle of Trafalgar took place) in Hampton Road, Suffolk. His mother died when he was six, so he was sent to a boarding school in the vicinity of Brighton. At the age of 12, he joined the Royal Naval College at Portsmouth. He earned outstanding marks, the mathematics prize and became the first in his class. At the age of 14 he embarked as a voluntary student on board on the HMS Owen Glendower, on the way to South America. A year later he was promoted to midshipman. At the age of 19, after having served in the Mediterranean, the English Channel and South America, he was promoted to lieutenant, becoming the first in his promotion of 27 to achieve that rank. In 1831 the Admiralty put him in command of the second hydrographic expedition (1831-1836), complementing Stokes's interrupted first one, returning once again to South America as captain of the HMS Beagle. Among the passengers aboard were the three Fuegian natives (Boat Memory had died in England), and the young naturalist Charles Darwin. During this voyage, Darwin began to sketch his well known Theory of Evolution. By 1841 Fitz Roy held a seat at the British Parliament. He promoted the information gathering process for a safer navigation. In 1843 he was offered the post of Governor of New Zealand. His arrival in the island was not welcome, because of his permissiveness with the aboriginal Maori population and with foreigner groups that settled there. Two years later he returned to London. After holding several positions and retiring in 1850, he devoted his time to the building of meteorological statistics at the London's Commerce Chamber. Later on he founded what is nowadays the Meteorological Office or "Met Office". He promoted the installation of barometers and other devices for the statistic follow-up and forecast of the weather. By 1861 he gave the first alert signal through a telegraph line to the London media. Robert Fitz Roy killed himself in 1865. It is presumed that suicide was a strange familiar illness, because his uncle had already taken his life years before.

4. In whose memory one of the fiords of the Magellan Strait is named in Spanish "Seno Otway".

5. In whose memory another fiord of the Magellan Strait was named "Seno Skyring"

6. The original names were el'leparu, o'run-del'lico and yok'cushly. See images annex.

7. Fitz Roy wrote in his diary: "I had thought to take the fueguinos to England, thinking on the benefits I would give them by knowing our habits and language. This would compensate for the temporary distance from their country. But I had not that in mind when I brought them on board. At that moment I only thought on keeping them while we were along these coasts. But afterwards, when I saw they were happy and in good health, I started thinking in the many advantages that they and their countrymen could derive from this, as well as for us if we took them to England. There we could educate them as much as possible and afterwards we could send them back to Tierra del Fuego. By choosing this last course I assumed a big responsibility, but I was aware of what I was doing".


Beyond Edge

Richard Dawkins & Brian Eno @ The Oxford Playhouse: Fri 4 September [...]

Marc Hauser is going to the dogs in Science Magazine [...]

The Tories' interest In Nassim Taleb's Black Swan on BBC-TV [...]

Alison Gopnik investigates the infant mind in Scientific American interview by Jonah Lehrer [...]

Mark Henderson: "Richard Dawkins, Brian Eno and the art of evolution" in The Times Online [...]

Jerry Coyne: "Robert Wright: Pirouetting on the fence" [...]; "The New Yorker takes a swipe at everyone" in which Coyne takes on critic James Woods's piece "God In The Quad"[...]; James Woods replies [...]; Sean Carroll and Carl Zimmer quit Bloggingheads for promoting creationism [...]

Lisa Randall re-imagines her extradimensional theories of the universe as opera in SEED [...]

PZ Myers: Baby Bear's lament: James Wood in the New Yorker [...]

Sean Carroll: "Bye to Bloggingheads" [...]

A. C. Grayling on Graham Farmelo's The Strangest Man: The Hidden Life of Paul Dirac, Mystic of the Atom at Barnes & Noble Review [...]

Carl Zimmer: "Bloggingheads and the Old Challenges of New Tools" [...]

Lawrence Krauss: New York Times OpEd Contributor: 'A One-Way Ticket to Mars' [...]


Chris Anderson, W. Brian Arthur, John Barrow, Thomas Bass, Jeremy Bernstein, Susan Blackmore. Stewart Brand, John Brockman, Max Brockman, David Buss, Nicholas Christakis, Andy Clarke, Gregory Cochran,Jack Cohen, Jerry Coyne, Richard Dawkins, Stanislas Dehaene, Keith Devlin, Denis Dutton, Freeman Dyson, David Eagleman, Todd Feinberg, James Fowler, Howard Gardner, Anthony Giddens, Daniel Goleman, Alison Gopnik, Susan Greenfield, Haim Harari, Henry Harpendening, Gerald Holton, Nicholas Humphrey, George Johnson, Steven Johnson, Stephen H Kellert, Marek Kohn, Ray Kurzweil, Jaron Lanier, Jonah Lehrer, John McWhorter, Thomas Metzinger, Oliver Morton, David G. Myers, Richard E. Nisbett, Alva Noë, Hans Ulrich Obrist, Dean Ornish, John Allen Paulos, Alex (Sandy) Pentland, Irene M. Pepperberg, Clifford Pickover, David G. Post, Douglas Rushkoff, Karl Sabbagh, Scott Sampson, Al Seckel, Clay Shirky, Gavin Schmidt, Tom Standage, Bruce Sterling, Ian Stewart, Steven Strogatz, Colin Tudge, Sherry Turkle, Antony Valentini, E.O. Wilson, Lewis Wolpert, Richard Wrangham, Carl Zimmer [...]


subscribe
Email address:
Your name
(required) :
country:


"For those seeking substance over sheen, the occasional videos released at Edge.org hit the mark. The Edge Foundation community is a circle, mainly scientists but also other academics, entrepreneurs, and cultural figures. ... Edge's long-form interview videos are a deep-dive into the daily lives and passions of its subjects, and their passions are presented without primers or apologies. The decidedly noncommercial nature of Edge's offerings, and the egghead imprimatur of the Edge community, lend its videos a refreshing air, making one wonder if broadcast television will ever offer half the off-kilter sparkle of their salon chatter." — Boston Globe

Mahzarin Banaji, Samuel Barondes, Yochai Benkler, Paul Bloom, Rodney Brooks, Hubert Burda, George Church, Nicholas Christakis, Brian Cox, Iain Couzin, Helena Cronin, Paul Davies, Daniel C. Dennett, David Deutsch,Dennis Dutton, Jared Diamond, Freeman Dyson, Drew Endy, Peter Galison, Murray Gell-Mann, David Gelernter, Neil Gershenfeld, Anthony Giddens, Gerd Gigerenzer, Daniel Gilbert, Rebecca Goldstein, John Gottman, Brian Greene, Anthony Greenwald, Alan Guth, David Haig, Marc D. Hauser, Walter Isaacson, Steve Jones, Daniel Kahneman, Stuart Kauffman, Ken Kesey, Stephen Kosslyn, Lawrence Krauss, Ray Kurzweil, Jaron Lanier, Armand Leroi, Seth Lloyd, Gary Marcus, John Markoff, Ernst Mayr, Marvin Minsky, Sendhil Mullainathan, Dennis Overbye, Dean Ornish, Elaine Pagels, Steven Pinker, Jordan Pollack, Lisa Randall, Martin Rees, Matt Ridley, Lee Smolin, Elisabeth Spelke, Scott Sampson, Robert Sapolsky, Dimitar Sasselov, Stephen Schneider, Martin Seligman, Robert Shapiro, Clay Shirky, Lee Smolin, Dan Sperber, Paul Steinhardt, Steven Strogatz, Seirian Sumner, Leonard Susskind, Nassim Nicholas Taleb, Timothy Taylor, Richard Thaler, Robert Trivers, Neil Turok, J.Craig Venter, Edward O. Wilson, Lewis Wolpert, Richard Wrangham, Philip Zimbardo

[Continue to Edge Video]



Nearly impossible to put down: engaging original essays from brilliant young scientists on their work — and its fascinating social, ethical, and philosophical implications. The Barnes & Noble Review Long List

The engrossing essay collection which offers a youthful spin on some of the most pressing scientific issues of today—and tomorrow...Kinda scary? Yes! Super smart and interesting? Definitely. The Observer's Very Short List

"A captivating collection of essays ... a medley of big ideas." — Amanda Gefter, New Scientist

"The perfect collection for people who like to stay up on recent scientific research but haven't the time or expertise to go to the original sources." — Playback.stl.com

WHAT'S NEXT?
Dispatches on the Future of Science
Edited By Max Brockman

If these authors are the future of science, then the science of the future will be one exciting ride! Find out what the best minds of the new generation are thinking before the Nobel Committee does. A fascinating chronicle of the big, new ideas that are keeping young scientists up at night. Daniel Gilbert, author of Stumbling on Happiness

"A preview of the ideas you're going to be reading about in ten years." — Steven Pinker, author of The Stuff of Thought

"Brockman has a nose for talent." — Nassim Nicholas Taleb, author The Black Swan

"Capaciously accessible, these writings project a curiosity to which followers of science news will gravitate." — Booklist


WHAT HAVE YOU CHANGED YOUR MIND ABOUT
Edited by John Brockman
With An Introduction By BRIAN ENO

The world's finest minds have responded with some of the most insightful, humbling, fascinating confessions and anecdotes, an intellectual treasure trove. ... Best three or four hours of intense, enlightening reading you can do for the new year. Read it now."
San Francisco Chronicle

"A great event in the Anglo-Saxon culture."
El Mundo


Praise for the online publication of
What Have You Change Your Mind About?

"The splendidly enlightened Edge website (www.edge.org) has rounded off each year of inter-disciplinary debate by asking its heavy-hitting contributors to answer one question. I strongly recommend a visit." The Independent

"A great event in the Anglo-Saxon culture." El Mundo

"As fascinating and weighty as one would imagine." The Independent

"They are the intellectual elite, the brains the rest of us rely on to make sense of the universe and answer the big questions. But in a refreshing show of new year humility, the world's best thinkers have admitted that from time to time even they are forced to change their minds." The Guardian

"Even the world's best brains have to admit to being wrong sometimes: here, leading scientists respond to a new year challenge." The Times

"Provocative ideas put forward today by leading figures."The Telegraph

The world's finest minds have responded with some of the most insightful, humbling, fascinating confessions and anecdotes, an intellectual treasure trove. ... Best three or four hours of intense, enlightening reading you can do for the new year. Read it now." San Francisco Chronicle

"As in the past, these world-class thinkers have responded to impossibly open-ended questions with erudition, imagination and clarity." The News & Observer

"A jolt of fresh thinking...The answers address a fabulous array of issues. This is the intellectual equivalent of a New Year's dip in the lake—bracing, possibly shriek-inducing, and bound to wake you up." The Globe and Mail

"Answers ring like scientific odes to uncertainty, humility and doubt; passionate pleas for critical thought in a world threatened by blind convictions." The Toronto Star

"For an exceptionally high quotient of interesting ideas to words, this is hard to beat. ...What a feast of egg-head opinionating!" National Review Online


WHAT ARE YOU OPTIMISTIC ABOUT?
Today's Leading Thinkers on Why Things Are Good and Getting Better
Edited by John Brockman
Introduction by DANIEL C. DENNETT



[2007]

"The optimistic visions seem not just wonderful but plausible." Wall Street Journal

"Persuasively upbeat." O, The Oprah Magazine

"Our greatest minds provide nutshell insights on how science will help forge a better world ahead." Seed

"Uplifting...an enthralling book." The Mail on Sunday


WHAT IS YOUR DANGEROUS IDEA?
Today's Leading Thinkers on the Unthinkable
Edited by John Brockman
Introduction by STEVEN PINKER
Afterword by RICHARD DAWKINS


[2006]

"Danger – brilliant minds at work...A brilliant bok: exhilarating, hilarious, and chilling." The Evening Standard (London)

"A selection of the most explosive ideas of our age." Sunday Herald

"Provocative" The Independent

"Challenging notions put forward by some of the world's sharpest minds" Sunday Times

"A titillating compilation" The Guardian

"Reads like an intriguing dinner party conversation among great minds in science" Discover


WHAT WE BELIEVE BUT CANNOT PROVE?
Today's Leading Thinkers on Science in the Age of Certainty
Edited by John Brockman
Introduction by IAN MCEWAN


[2006]

"Whether or not we believe proof or prove belief, understanding belief itself becomes essential in a time when so many people in the world are ardent believers." LA Times

"Belief appears to motivate even the most rigorously scientific minds. It stimulates and challenges, it tricks us into holding things to be true against our better judgment, and, like scepticism -its opposite -it serves a function in science that is playful as well as thought-provoking. not we believe proof or prove belief, understanding belief itself becomes essential in a time when so many people in the world are ardent believers." The Times

"John Brockman is the PT Barnum of popular science. He has always been a great huckster of ideas." The Observer

"An unprecedented roster of brilliant minds, the sum of which is nothing short of an oracle—a book ro be dog-eared and debated." Seed

"Scientific pipedreams at their very best." The Guardian

"Makes for some astounding reading." Boston Globe

"Fantastically stimulating...It's like the crack cocaine of the thinking world.... Once you start, you can't stop thinking about that question." BBC Radio 4

"Intellectual and creative magnificence" The Skeptical Inquirer



[2008]



"Compelling"
"Stellar"
"Important"

[2006]

"Irresistible"
"Excellent"
"Fascinating"


[2006]

"incisive"
"deeply passionate"
"engaging"

[2004]

"Intriguing"
"Engrossing"
"Invigorating"



[1994]

"Rousing"
"Astonishing"
"Bloodthirsty"

[2000]

"Dazzling"
"Wondrous"
"Outstanding"


[2002]


"Provocative"
"Captivating"
"Mind-stretching"

Edge Foundation, Inc. is a nonprofit private operating foundation under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.


|Top|