HOW IS THE INTERNET CHANGING THE WAY YOU THINK? |
WHAT WILL CHANGE EVERYTHING? |

Impíos deseos al empezar el año
By Arcadia Espada

Al rito solar del Año Nuevo, el concierto de Viena (me paso las dos horas de valses, fantaseando con el frío de fuera, y la choucroute caliente y morosa que le espera al primer concertino: todo lo que me gusta me da hambre) y los saltos en Garmisch Partenkirchen se ha unido ya la pregunta de Edge. |

HEUTE IN DEN FEUILLETONS
Das Versagen der Linken im Gaza-Krieg
In der "SZ" erinnert sich Sibylle Lewitscharoff an ihre Zeit bei der Gruppe Spartacus Bolschewiki-Leninisten. Die "NZZ" hat in Detroit in die vielen Gesichter des Nichts gesehen. Und die "FAZ" erkennt in der chinesischen Markenpiraterie die Intelligenz des Volkes.
Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 10.01.2009...Weiteres: Wie es aussieht, "wenn die Intelligenz von sich selber träumt", weiß Thomas Thiel seit der Umfrage des Magazins edge.org unter hochdekorierten Naturwissenschaftlern zu der Frage: "Welche Entwicklung könnte könnte zu Ihren Lebzeiten alles ändern?" |

Visionen der Wissenschaft
Wenn die Intelligenz von sich selber träumt
Von Thomas Thiel

Man steigt, heißt es, nicht zweimal in denselben Fluss. Aber man hofft doch, als derselbe ans Ufer zurückzukehren. Nur im Horizont dieses Bildes zeigt sich die Radikalität der Frage, die der Literaturagent John Brockman von der Organisation "Edge" (Edge — die Website) der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft vorgelegt hat: „Welche Entwicklung könnte zu Ihren Lebzeiten alles ändern?"
|

Science in the Street
By Ramón González & Férriz Y Diego Salazar
Humanism today limps as Andalusia ostensibly despises science. Gonzalez and Salazar Férriz indicate a new and commendable effort to remedy that Soanish ignorance: Culture 3.0.
|

Science visions, dark and bright
By J. Peder Zane
That's the question John Brockman, editor of the Web site edge.org, posed to about 160 cutting-edge minds in his 11th annual Edge Question. As in years past, they responded with bold, often thrilling, sometimes chilling, answers. |

Richard Dawkins: How would you feel about a half-human half-chimp hybrid?
Dawkins speculates about how a human-chimp hybrid or the discovery of a living Homo erectus would change the way we see the world. — James
Dawkins — author of The Selfish Gene and The God Delusion — muses on the effect of breaking down the barrier between humans and animals, perhaps by the creation of a chimera in a lab or a "successful hybridisation between a human and a chimpanzee".
Here's what he had to say.... |

New Year 2009: Leading thinkers offer predictions of 'next big thing'
By Jon Swaine
Leading thinkers — including Craig Venter and Ian McEwan — have marked New Year 2009 by predicting what will be the next big thing to shape the future.
[PHOTO: IAN MCKEWAN/PHILIP HOLLIS]
[Caption: Ian McEwan: predicts the full flourishing of solar technology as one of the next 'big things']
... Their task was set by Edge, an online intellectual discussion group, which claims its membership comprises "the most interesting minds in the world".
The responses spanned new methods of energy production, the dawn of telepathy, freely available artificial intelligence and the colonisation of the Milky Way."
|

THE BIG STORY
Weekend reading
ANALYSIS
The Big Question Of The Year
By Linton Weeks
Every year, John Brockman — who runs the nonprofit Edge Foundation in New York — asks a gaggle of forward-thinking people a provocative question. |

Brian Eno: The feeling that things are inevitably going to get worse
The artist and composer responds to this year's Edge.org question: What will change everything?
[PHOTO: BRIAN ENO/EAMONN MCCABE]
What would change everything is not even a thought. It's more of a feeling. |

OPINION PAGE
THE BIG STORY
Weekend reading
Edge World Question 2009: What will change everything?
Annual science survey asks: "What game-changing scientific ideas and developments do you expect to live to see?" |

Top thinkers divided on whether future is bright
Chris Watt
The predictions range from miracle cures and world peace to economic ruin and nuclear war. If there is a theme to the World Questions 2009, an online survey of some of the world's top thinkers, it would seem to be inconsistency.
The wide range of answers they gave provides a snapshot of the hopes — and fears — that may come to define our times. |

JOHN HORGAN/
GEORGE JOHNSON
Science Saturday: The More Things Change... (27:45)
JH: Yes, the annual question from John Brockman, the science book impressario. He's got this great site edge.org 2hich we've talked about before and every year he asks this question and he's asks this ever-growing stable of people, primarily scientists but a of of quasi-scientist pundits to respond this question. The question this year is "What will change everything".
GJ: Yes, Good New Year's Day reading. |

PZ MYERS
Brockman asks, we answer |

What Will Change Everything?
By Brady Forrest
Regular Radar contributor Linda Stone sent this in to be posted today.
...Venter imagines creating life from synthetic materials and expects that our view of life, itself, will be transformed.
Nobel Laureate, Frank Wilczek, believes everything will continue to become smaller, faster, cooler, and cheaper — with its implications of an Internet on steroids and exciting new designer materials. |

Essays and Opinion
Printing — electricity — radio — antibiotics: after them, nothing was the same. Intellectual impresario John Brockman asks a select group of thinkers, "What will change everything?"... more» |

Leading thinkers predict technologies that will turn the world upside-down
James Randerson, science correspondent
[Caption: Ian McEwan muses that we will look back and 'wonder why we ever thought we had a problem when we are bathed in such beneficent radiant energy'. Photograph: Getty]
Flying cars, personal jetpacks, holidays on the moon, the paperless office — the predictions of futurologists are, it seems, doomed to fail. The only thing predictable about the future is its unpredictability.
But that has not stopped edge.org — the online intellectual salon — asking which ideas and inventions will provide humanity's next leap forward. |

Science minds reveal vision of life, the universe and everything
Mark Henderson, Senior Editor
Most scientists like to dream about what will change the world — even if they understand that their own work is never likely to have quite the impact of a Copernicus or a Darwin.
The fascinating breadth of their visions of the future is revealed today by the discussion Website edge.com, which has asked some of the world's finest minds the question: "What will change everything?" |

LAB NOTES
Crystal-Ball Time
By Sharon Begley
Every December the online intellectual salon called Edge, presided over by literary agent John Brockman, asks a select (virtual) assembly of scientists to ponder a question, such as what they are optimistic about (2007), what "dangerous" ideas they have (2006) and what they believe is true but cannot prove (2005). As the bell tolls on 2008 and rings in 2009, Edge is unveiling this year's: "What game-changing scientific ideas and developments do you expect to live to see?" |

SCIENCE BLOG
Which technological wonders are set to change everything?
The world's greatest thinkers have revealed the ideas and technologies they think will change the world forever. Now it's our turn ...
James Randerson, science correspondent
|
WHAT HAVE YOU CHANGED YOUR MIND ABOUT? |
 |

The splendidly enlightened Edge Website (www.edge.org) has rounded off each year of inter-disciplinary debate by asking its heavy-hitting contributors to answer one question. I songly recommend a visit.
|

A great event in the Anglo-Saxon culture |

As fascinating and weighty as one would imagine |

They are the intellectual elite, the brains the rest of us rely on to make sense of the universe and answer the big questions. But in a refreshing show of new year humility, the world's best thinkers have admitted that from time to time even they are forced to change their minds |

Even the world's best brains have to admit to being wrong sometimes: here, leading scientists respond to a new year challenge |

Provocative ideas put forward today by leading figures |

The world's finest minds have responded with some of the most insightful, humbling, fascinating confessions and anecdotes, an intellectual treasure trove. ... Best three or four hours of intense, enlightening reading you can do for the new year. Read it now. |

As in the past, these world-class thinkers have responded to impossibly open-ended questions with erudition, imagination and clarity. |

A jolt of fresh thinking...The answers address a fabulous array of issues. This is the intellectual equivalent of a New Year's dip in the lake — bracing, possibly shriek-inducing, and bound to wake you up |

Answers ring like scientific odes to uncertainty, humility and doubt; passionate pleas for critical thought in a world threatened by blind convictions
|

For an exceptionally high quotient of interesting ideas to words, this is hard to beat. ...What a feast of egg-head opinionating!. |

|

Was
läuft hier richtig?
Der neue Optimismus
der Wissenschaften kommt gerade zur rechten Zeit
RALF
BÖNT |

C'est la double question posée par John Brockman, éditeur
de Edge à plus de 160 "penseurs de la troisième
culture, ces savants et autres penseurs du monde empirique
qui, par leur travail ou leurs écrits prennent la
place des intellectuels traditionnels en rendant visibles
les sens profonds de nos vies, en redéfinissant autant
qui nous sommes que ce que nous sommes".
Ça change des unes constamment catastrophiques
de nos médias habituels. |

But when the scientific thinkers look beyond their own specializations
to the big picture, they continue to find cause for cheer — foreseeing
an end to war, for example, or the simultaneous solution
of our global warming and energy problems. The most general
grounds for optimism offered by these thinkers, though,
is that big-picture pessimism so often proves to be unfounded. |

Global
warming, the war on terror and rampant consumerism getting
you down? Well, lighten up: here, 17 of the world's smartest
scientists and academics share their reasons to be cheerful |

Brockman's respondents were forward-looking, describing
cutting-edge research that will help combat global warming
and other looming problems. |

How Doomed Are We?
Edgie's Chris
Anderson of TED and Robert
Provine of University of Maryland as
the proponents of optimism on program concerning
Optimism and the Doomsday Clock |

a titillating
compilation |

Peering into their crystal telescopes, the world's leading
scientists see a magnificent future |

El foro virtual Edge propone buscar razones, no simplemente
deseos, para el optimismo. Edge es un club que reúne,
segén ellos mismos, algunas de las mentes más
interesantes del mundo. Su propósito es estimular
discusiones en las fronteras del conocimiento. La intención
es llegar al borde del conocimiento mundial, acercándose
a las mentes más complejas y refinadas, juntarlas
en un foro y hacerlos que se pregunten las preguntas
que ellos mismos se hacen. La fundación actúa,
de este modo, como surtidora de problemas y alojamiento
de réplicas. Cada ano se constituye como Centro
Mundial de Preguntas. |

God bless those upbeat scientists |

Looking
through rose-colored microscopes
Why some scientists are optimistic
about the future
|

One way or another the answers should give you a warm
glow — either because you agree, or because they
make you angry. |

Edge's future-themed article is making some news....
From the lips of contributors to the online magazine
Edge to God's ears (one wonders if She or It may be listening):
dozens of scientists and other thinkers have looked ahead
to the future.
|

a Web site that aims to bridge the gap between scientists
and other thinkers |

[E]ven in the face of such threats as global warming and
religious fundamentalism, scientists remain positive about
the future. |

People's fascination for religion and superstition will
disappear within a few decades as television and the Internet
make it easier to get information, and scientists get closer
to discovering a final theory of everything, leading thinkers
argue today. |

What are you optimistic about? Why? Tons of brilliant thinkers
respond. |

What
Are You Optimistic About?
Posted by Hemos on Monday January 01,
from the explain-yourself dept. |

Intellectual impresario John Brockman puts his annual
Edge question to
leading thinkers. |

What are you optimistic about? Intellectual
impresario John Brockman puts his annual Edge question
to leading thinkers...
|

[A]ccording to Edge — the
heady Website for world-class
scientists and thinkers, and the brainchild of author and
entrepreneurial idea man, John Brockman, there's good news
ahead. |

|

KYUNG HANG (Soeul)
The
great
world-wide
scholars
talk
about
their
'dangerous
ideas'.

|

Most of the contributors appear to have
interpreted "dangerous" as
meaning something like "subversive," challenging
to one or another received orthodoxy. |

Meine
gefährlichste Idee. Seit nunmehr
neun Jahren startet die Stiftung Edge
mit einer Umfrage zu einem großen
generellen Thema ins neue Jahr. |

Crónicas
Bárbaras Ciencia racista, atractiva
pero muy peligrosa. |

(Sydney)
Into the minds of the believers. With
the aim of gathering ideas from the
world's leading thinkers on intellectual,
philosophical, artistic and literary
issues, US writer John Brockman established
The Edge Foundation in 1988. |

Royal
Society president Martin Rees said the
most dangerous idea was public concern
that science and technology were running
out of control. |

Audacious
Knowledge. What is a dangerous idea?
One not assumed to be false, but possibly
true?What do you believe is true even
though you cannot prove it?" |

Seductive
power of a hazardous idea. The responses
to Brockman's question do not directly
engage with each other, but they do worry
away at a core set of themes. |

Academics
see gene cloning perils, untamed global
warming and personality-changing drugs
as presenting the gravest dangers for
the future of civiliztion |

Risky
ideas; What do scientists currently regard
as the most dangerous thoughts? |


Be
Afraid. Edge.org canvassed scientists for
their "most dangerous idea." David
Buss, a psychologist at the University
of Texas, chose "The Evolution of
Evil." |

The
most dangerous idea. Brockman's challenge
is noteworthy because his buddies include
many of the world's greatest scientists:
Freeman Dyson, David Gelertner, J. Craig
Venter, Jared Diamond, Brian Greene. |

Dangerous
Ideas About Modern Life. Free will does
not exist. We are not always created
equal. Science will never be able to
address our deepest concerns. |

Genome
sequencing pioneer Craig Venter suggests
greater understanding of how genes influence
characteristics such as personality,
intelligence and athletic capability
could lead to conflict in society. |

The
wilder shores of creativity. He asked
his roster of thinkers [...] to nominate
an idea, not necessarily their own, they
consider dangerous not because it is
false, but because it might be true. |

From cloning to predetermination of sex:
the answers of investigators and philosophers
to a question on the online salon Edge. |

Who
controls humans? God? The genes? Or nevertheless
the computer? The on-line forum Edge
asked its yearly question — and
the answers raised more questions. |

La
pregunta de l'any. La Web Edge.org penjarà l'1
de gener la pregunta de l'any. La del
2005 va ser resposta per 120 ments de
l'anomenada 'tercera cultura', que van
reflexionar sobre l'enunciat "Què creus
que és veritat tot i no poder-ho
demostrar?" |

THE HANKYOREH (Seoul)
 |

The
117 respondents include Richard Dawkins,
Freeman Dyson, Daniel Dennett, Jared
Diamond — and that's just the
D's! As you might expect, the submissions
are brilliant and very controversial. |

Gene
discoveries highlight dangers facing
society. Mankind's increasing understanding
of the way genes influence behaviour
and the issue's potential to cause ethical
and moral dilemmas is one of the biggest
dangers facing society, according to
leading scientists. |

Why
it can be a very smart move to start
life with a Jewish momma: There is one
dangerous idea that still trumps them
all: the notion that, as Steven Pinker
describes it, "groups of people
may differ genetically in their average
talents and temperaments". For "groups
of people", read "races." |

The
Earth can cope with global warming, schools
should be banned and we should learn
to love bacteria. These are among the
dangerous ideas revealed by a poll of
leading thinkers. |

Science
can be a risky game, as Galileo learned
to his cost. Now John Brockman asks over
a hundred thinkers, "What is your
most dangerous idea?" |

"Our
brains are constantly subjected to the
demands of multi-tasking and a seemingly
endless cacophony of information from
diverse sources. " |

Very
complex systems — whether organisms,
brains, the biosphere, or the universe
itself — were not constructed by
design; all have evolved. There is a
new set of metaphors to describe ourselves,
our minds, the universe, and all of the
things we know in it. |

John
Brockman Blogs Edge's Annual
Question on Huff Po |

|
 |
| The
natural gift of consciousness should be treasured
all the more for its transience. |
 |
The
answers...exert an un- questionable morbid
fascination — those are the very ideas
that scientists cannot confess in their technical
papers. |
 |
"Fate
largo alle «beautiful minds» di
Roberto Casati;;
"La
terza cultura di John Brockman" di
Armando Massarenti |
 |
God
(or Not), Physics and, of Course, Love: Scientists
Take a Leap: Fourteen scientists ponder everything
from string theory to true love. |
 |
| Space
Without Time, Time Without Rest: John Brockman's
Question for the Republic of Wisdom — It
can be more thrilling to start the New Year
with a good question than with a good intention.
That's what John Brockman is doing for the
eight time in a row. |
 |
| What
do you believe to be true, even though you
can't prove it? John Brockman asked over a
hundred scientists and intellectuals... more» ...
Edge |
 |
That's
what online magazine The Edge — the
World Question Center asked over 120 scientists,
futurists, and other interesting minds. Their
answers are sometimes short and to the point |
 |
| Science's
Scourge of Believers Declares His Faith
in Darwin... |
 |
| Singolare
inchiesta in usa di un sito Internet. Ha chiesto
ai signori della ricerca di svelare i loro "atti
di fede". Sono arrivate le risposte piu'
imprevedibili i fantasmi dello scienziato:
non ho prove ma ci credo. |
 |
| To
celebrate the new year, online magazine Edge asked
some leading thinkers a simple question:
What do you believe but cannot prove? Here
is a selection of their responses... |
 |
| Scientists
dream too — imagine that |
 |
| "Fantastically
stimulating ...Once
you start, you can't stop thinking about that
question. It's like the crack cocaine of the thinking world." — BBC Radio 4 |
 |
| Scientists,
increasingly, have become our public intellectuals,
to whom we look for explanations and solutions.
These may be partial and imperfect, but they
are more satisfactory than the alternatives. |
 |
Bangladesh — The
cynic and the optimist, the agnostic and
the believer, the rationalist and the obscurantist,
the scientist and the speculative philosopher,
the realist and the idealist-all converge
on a critical point in their thought process
where reasoning loses its power. |
 |
Il
Sole 24 Ore-Domenica Segnalate le vostre
cuioosita, chiederemo riposta alle persone
piu autorevoli |
 |
| "So
now, into the breach comes John Brockman, the literary
agent and gadfly, whose online scientific salon,
Edge.org, has become one of the most interesting
stopping places on the Web. He begins every year
by posing a question to his distinguished roster
of authors and invited guests. Last year he asked
what sort of counsel each would offer George W.
Bush as the nation's top science adviser. This
time the question is "What's your law?" |
 |
| "John
Brockman, a New York literary agent, writer and
impresario of the online salon Edge, figures it
is time for more scientists to get in on the whole
naming thing...As a New Year's exercise, he asked
scores of leading thinkers in the natural and social
sciences for "some bit of wisdom, some rule
of nature, some law-like pattern, either grand
or small, that you've noticed in the universe that
might as well be named after you." |
 |
| "John
Brockman has posted an intriguing question on his
Edge Website. Brockman advises his would-be legislators
to stick to the scientific disciplines." |
 |
| "Everything
answers to the rule of law. Nature. Science. Society.
All of it obeys a set of codes...It's the thinker's
challenge to put words to these unwritten rules.
Do so, and he or she may go down in history. Like
a Newton or, more recently, a Gordon Moore, who
in 1905 coined the most cited theory of the technological
age, an observation on how computers grow exponentially
cheaper and more powerful... Recently, John Brockman
went looking for more laws." |
 |
 |
| "In
2002, he [Brockman] asked respondents to imagine
that they had been nominated as White House science
adviser and that President Bush had sought their
answer to 'What are the pressing scientific issues
for the nation and the world, and what is your
advice on how I can begin to deal with them?'Here
are excerpts of some of the responses. " |
 |
| "Edge's
combination of political
engagement and blue-sky thinking
makes stimulating reading
for anyone seeking a glimpse
into the next decade." |
 |
"Dear
W: Scientists Offer
President Advice on Policy" |
 |
| "There
are
84
responses,
ranging
in
topic
from
advanced
nanotechnology
to
the
psychology
of
foreign
cultures,
and
lots
of
ideas
regarding
science,
technology,
politics,
and
education." |
 |
| "Brockman's
thinkers of the 'Third Culture,'
whether they, like Dawkins,
study evolutionary biology
at Oxford or, like Alan Alda,
portray scientists on Broadway,
know no taboos. Everything
is permitted, and nothing
is excluded from this intellectual
game." |
 |
| "The
responses are generally
written in an engaging,
casual style (perhaps encouraged
by the medium of e-mail),
and are often fascinating
and thought — provoking....
These are all wonderful,
intelligent questions..." |
 |
| "We
are interested in 'thinking smart,'" declares
Brockman on the site, "we are not interested
in the anesthesiology of 'wisdom.'" |
 |
| "INSPIRED
ARENA: Edge has been bringing together the world's
foremost scientific thinkers since 1998, and
the response to September 11 was measured and
uplifting." |
 |
| "Responses
to this year's question are deliciously creative...
the variety astonishes. Edge continues
to launch intellectual skyrockets of stunning
brilliance. Nobody in the world is doing what Edge is
doing." |
 |
| "Once
a year, John Brockman of New York, a writer
and literary agent who represents many scientists,
poses a question in his online journal, The
Edge, and invites the thousand or so people
on his mailing list to answer it." |
 |
| "Don't
assume for a second that Ted Koppel, Charlie
Rose and the editorial high command at the New
York Times have a handle on all the pressing
issues of the day.... a lengthy list of profound,
esoteric and outright entertaining responses. |

The
Greatest Inventions of the Past 2,000 Years
Edited
by John
Brockman
|
 |
| "A terrific, thought provoking site." |
 |
| "The
Power of Big Ideas" |
 |
| "The
Nominees for Best Invention Of the Last Two Millennia
Are . . ." |
 |
| "...Thoughtful and often surprising answers
....a fascinating survey of intellectual and
creative wonders of the world ..... Reading
them reminds me of how wondrous our world is." — Bill Gates, New York Times Syndicated
Column |
 |
| "A
site that has raised electronic discourse on the
Web to a whole new level.... Genuine learning seems
to be going on here." |
 |
| "To
mark the first anniversary of [Edge],
Brockman posed a question: 'Simply reading the
six million volumes in the Widener Library does
not necessarily lead to a complex and subtle
mind," he wrote, referring to the Harvard
library. "How to avoid the anesthesiology
of wisdom?' " |
 |
| "Home
to often lively, sometimes obscure and almost
always ambitious discussions." |
 |
"Open-minded,
free-ranging, intellectually playful
...an unadorned pleasure in curiosity,
a collective expression of wonder
at the living and inanimate world
... an ongoing and thrilling colloquium." — Ian
McEwan, Author of Saturday |
 |
"Astounding
reading." |
 |
"An
unprecedented roster of brilliant minds,
the sum of which is nothing short of
visionary" |
 |
"Fantastically
stimulating...It's like the crack cocaine
of the thinking world.... Once you
start, you can't stop thinking about
that question." |
 |
"Wonderful
reading." |
 |
"One of the most interesting
stopping places on the Web" |
 |
"Brilliant! Stimulating reading." |
  |
"Today's visions of science
tomorrow." |
 |
"Fascinating and thought-provoking
...wonderful, intelligent." |
 |
"Edge.org...a Web site devoted
to dis- cussions of cutting edge science." |
 |
"Awesome indie newsletter with
brilliant contributors." |
 |
"Everything is permitted, and
nothing is excluded from this intellectual
game." |
 |
"Websites of the year...Inspired
Arena...the world's foremost scientific
thinkers." |
 |
"High concept all the way...the
brightest scientists and thinkers ...
heady ... deep and refreshing." |
 |
" Deliciously creative...the variety
astonishes...intel-lectual skyrockets of
stunning brill-iance. Nobody in the
world is doing what Edge is
doing." |
 |
"A marvellous showcase for
the Internet, it comes very highly
recom-mended." |
 |
"Profound, esoteric and outright
enter-taining." |
 |
"A terrific, thought provoking
site." |
 |
"...Thoughtful and often surprising
...reminds me of how wondrous our world
is." — Bill Gates |
 |
"One of the Net's most prestigious,
invitation-only free trade zones for
the exchange of potent ideas." |
 |
"An enjoyable read." |
 |
"A-list: Dorothy Parker's Vicious
Circle without the food and alcohol
... a brilliant format." |
 |
"Big, deep and ambitous questions...
breathtaking in scope." |
 |
"Has raised electronic discourse
on the Web to a whole new level." |
 |
"Lively, sometimes obscure
and almost always ambitious." |
|
JASON DA SILVA
I really like the "Extended Mind" thesis articulated by Cognitive Philosophers David Chalmers and Andy Clark. The idea is that as our technological tools become exponentially more advanced they become more than just tools; they become an extension of our actual cognition. We should start thinking of our smartphones and computers as wireless, outsourced cognition, freeing up brain space for more creativity. We interface with these devices and the information they store in seamless ways: we engage with the world, and run our day to day lives via these extended minds.
Our extended minds make us smarter by extending our capacities.
We can think of the "extended mind" thesis as an evolution of Marshall McLuhan's ideas of media as an extension of the human nervous system, or Timothy Leary's views of the computer as "the LSD of the 90's."; the point being, the human mind is no longer fixed just to our skulls, but rather it has been distributed electronically. This symbiosis between biological and non-biological intelligence will continue to deepen at an exponential rate. |
FRANCESCA THYSSEN-BORNEMISZA
My Shamanist Experience Opens Up Questions And Answers
The abilities that I have — not just skills but what most people call intuition — I did not acquire exclusively in this life. I am now able to call upon what I learned and experienced in previous lives to assist me in understanding and coping with the obstacles that I face today. I am sure that countless books have been written about this topic, so I avoided looking it up on the Internet. It would probably be counterproductive and discourage me from writing these few lines.
A while back I felt that it was time for a change, time to stop complaining about feeling neglected. I realized that I was just attracting people into my life who either tried to take over and control me or else neglected me completely. There was no middle path, and it was up to me to change. So I traveled to Kiruna, Sweden, in the Arctic Circle, and met for breakfast an extraordinarily attractive and friendly shaman with piercing gray eyes. She was expecting me and knew exactly what I needed. She helped me change every aspect of my life that I had wanted to change.
In exhaustive sessions with her that averaged eight hours a day for three days, I traveled into the past and got an extensive glimpse into my previous lives. It turned out that other than once being a child bride who died at the young age of eleven, a figure who plays a very important part in my present life, and being an androgynous diplomat from Egypt, through whom I have learned many skills, I had always been a man. Most of my friends look at me when I tell them that and exclaim, "Well, that makes complete sense." I smile inwardly. I know that I am not at all masculine in this life, but it's the way I handle things. It carries weight, and in our society that is considered to be a masculine trait.
A few weeks after being "connected," I could see these figures again, more completely. What transpired was that I was always close to power. I now understand why I feel completely at ease around powerful people. I am attracted to them for sure. I also feel compelled to give them advice very directly even when unsolicited and am often surprised when I keep their attention long enough to somehow feel that I could make a difference in a positive way if I really set my mind to it.
No wonder, since I was once an adviser to a pharaoh in Egypt, to a czar, and to Napoleon, as well as serving as a diplomat in a sultan's court. I was also a famous artist who enjoyed the confidence of European royals, and all this without ever envying their power. What I brought to them was a bird's-eye view of what they could not see as they clung to their saddles of power. What I had not previously understood was that most of my lives succeeded one another, each life refining the skills of the previous one. They did not repeat themselves, but they required the same talent. But what interests me is not the extraordinary stories that I will one day endeavor to tell in a longer, more detailed elaboration of this article, but how we make deals when we come back and with whom we make these deals. Is it god, one another, our higher power?
The experience of familiar people and places does not form a great part of this for me, and I often feel that people get caught up in the romantic notion of "déjà vu." For me it is what I have learned over all these lives that makes them so real! The first time this knowledge started to change my life was in 1991. I was driving in a Soviet-style stretch limo along one of Moscow's super streets, with an island in the center that was used only by Politburo cars. I was alone with the Dalai Lama as we embarked on a trip around the soon-to-be-defunct Soviet Union. He turned to me and quite matter-of-factly said, "You must have collected many good karma points in your last life to be reborn into such privilege in this life."
Well, for someone who had only ever heard that she was spoiled, this compliment was a pleasant change, and the taste of the silver spoon in my mouth began to transform. He continued, "You will do great things in this life as you did in your last, except now you have been given new attributes, new tools, new gifts to work with." Since he also added that he did not believe in god, I wondered who would be doing this. Is it our collective spirit or a higher power? How do I explain this without challenging my faith, which is so strong. I fear no negative repercussions, but I know that I am shaking the doctrines of the church quite a bit, and I ask myself today, where do we actually come from? If we believe in the power of collective prayer, in which I am a firm believer, then why can't we believe in reincarnation?
Shamans can reconnect us to these superpowers in a way that seems unclear at first, strangely unfamiliar, but then it becomes more and more familiar, and the synergies that appear in a matrix of events seem to clear the way for more important things to happen.
New dynamics are forming, and life has become more transparent. I cannot accept the lack of transparency in business anymore. I am quick to make up my mind about people whom I don't like or who don't fit in to this new world order of people who are good, honest, and open. No more dysfunctional people clinging to me, making me feel guilty if I push them away. I am not so easily manipulated, abused, betrayed, or neglected. I speak my mind with less emotion but more truth. I see my objectives with more courage. I carry less fear around, and people hear that in my voice. I am at peace with myself because I can accept the journey of my past, and my self-worth feels nurtured by that knowledge. |
|