Edge.org
To arrive at the edge of the world's knowledge, seek out the most complex and sophisticated minds, put them in a room together, and have them ask each other the questions they are asking themselves.
Published on Edge.org (http://www.edge.org)

Home > WHAT *SHOULD* WE BE WORRIED ABOUT?

Peter Woit [1.14.13]
Topic:

The Edge web-site annual question feature is out today, with this year’s question What *Should* We Be Worried About?. I wrote something about the “Nightmare Scenario” that HEP is facing if the LHC finds a Standard Model Higgs and nothing else. ... Others addressed the same issue, with Lisa Randall writing: "In my specific field of particle physics, everyone is worried. I don’t say that lightly. I’ve been to two conferences within the last week where the future was a major topic of discussion and I’m at another one where it’s on the agenda." ... Amanda Gefter sees no reason to worry. Particle theorists will just move to making progress without experiment, through studying paradoxes of the current theory, with her final example for optimism the recent debate over the “firewall paradox”. ... Carlo Rovelli’s contribution explains one problem with this: humans are very good at convincing themselves they have found some wonderful explanation of something (e.g. some resolution of a paradox, like the supposed SUSY solution to the hierarchy problem), when reality actually involves something quite a bit more subtle and unexpected . . . [58 comments]

WHAT *SHOULD* WE BE WORRIED ABOUT? [1]

Related Content: 

WHAT *SHOULD* WE BE WORRIED ABOUT? [2]

News From: 

Not Even Wrong [3]
Peter Woit [4]
Read the full article → [5]
[ Mon. Jan. 14. 2013 ]

The Edge web-site annual question feature is out today, with this year’s question What *Should* We Be Worried About?. I wrote something about the “Nightmare Scenario”  [6]that HEP is facing if the LHC finds a Standard Model Higgs and nothing else. ... Others addressed the same issue, with Lisa Randall writing [7]: "In my specific field of particle physics, everyone is worried. I don’t say that lightly. I’ve been to two conferences within the last week where the future was a major topic of discussion and I’m at another one where it’s on the agenda." ... Amanda Gefter [8] sees no reason to worry. Particle theorists will just move to making progress without experiment, through studying paradoxes of the current theory, with her final example for optimism the recent debate over the “firewall paradox”. ... Carlo Rovelli’s [9] contribution explains one problem with this: humans are very good at convincing themselves they have found some wonderful explanation of something (e.g. some resolution of a paradox, like the supposed SUSY solution to the hierarchy problem), when reality actually involves something quite a bit more subtle and unexpected . . . [58 comments]

  • John Brockman, Editor and Publisher
  • Russell Weinberger, Associate Publisher
  • Karina Knoll, Editorial Assistant
 
  • Contact Info:editor@edge.org
  • In the News
  • Manage Email Subscription
  • Get Edge.org by email
 
Edge.org is a nonprofit private operating foundation under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Copyright © 2012 By Edge Foundation, Inc All Rights Reserved.

 


Links:
[1] http://www.edge.org/news/what-should-we-be-worried-about
[2] http://www.edge.org/annual-question/q2013
[3] http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/
[4] http://www.edge.org/memberbio/peter_woit
[5] http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=5465
[6] http://www.edge.org/response-detail/23680
[7] http://www.edge.org/response-detail/23840
[8] http://www.edge.org/response-detail/23766
[9] http://www.edge.org/response-detail/23695