"A
stellar cast of thinkers
tackles the really big questions
facing scientists.." — The
Guardian
"A
compact, if bumpy, tour through the minds of
some of the world's preeminent players in science
and technology." — Philadelphia
Inquirer
"[Brockman]
wisely exits the stage after a brief monologue
and turns the rest of the show over to his guests.
What a show they put on!" — San
Jose Mercury News
About
Edge: "Brilliant!" The
Sunday Times • "Deep" New
Scientist • "Thoughtful" Bill
Gates: New York Times Column • "Stimulating" The
Sunday Times (London) •"Fascinating" American
Scientist • "Terrific" Guardian
Unlimited • "Heady" Kevin
Kelly (Editor-At-Large, Wired) • "Influential" The
Times • "Lively" The
Independent • "A-List" Wired • "Inspired" The
Sunday Times •"Awesome" Wired •"Stunning" Arts & Letters
Daily •"Entertaining" San
Jose Mercury News •"Wonderful" The
Times (London) •"Interesting" The
New York Times •"Prestigious" Wired
News • "Marvellous" Prospect
|
SCIENCE AT THE EDGE
Edited, with an Introduction
by
John Brockman
UK: Weidenfeld & Nicholson
US: Barnes & Noble
August, 2004
|
|
Now
In Bookstores!
A new intellectual landscape from the cutting-edge thinkers
of today.
Who are the cutting-edge thinkers of today? John Brockman argues
that scientists - through their research and writing - are
creating
a 'third culture' in which the word "humanism" is
once more defined in terms of the 15th century idea of one intellectual
whole. Combining this holistic awareness of the humanities and
science, these "new humanists" are the ones shaping
modern thought. The result of conversations with over twenty
of today's top intellectuals, the book includes Jared Diamond on population
theory; Steven Pinker on human nature; Martin Rees on the future
of the universe. Science at the edge introduces us to the best
scientific minds of the 21st century, giving insight and debate
into how best to take humanity forward.
Based
on many of the best Edge features, revised for the
book.
Publication in in the US under the title The New Humanists:
Science At The Edge (Barnes & Noble).
Available
at Online Booksellers
|
Table of Contents & Contributors
|
Introduction:
The New Humanists
By John Brockman, editor
Something
radically new is in the air: new ways of understanding physical
systems, new ways of thinking about thinking that call into
question many of our basic assumptions. A realistic biology
of the mind, advances in physics, electricity, genetics,
neurobiology, engineering, the chemistry of materials—all
are challenging basic assumptions of who and what we are,
of what it means to be human. The arts and the sciences are
again joining together as one culture, the third culture.
Those involved in this effort—scientists, science-based
humanities scholars, writers—are at the center of today's
intellectual action.
They
are the new humanists. __________________________________________
JOHN BROCKMAN is
a cultural impresario whose career has encompassed the avant-garde
art world, science, books, software, and the Internet.
In the 1960s he coined the word "intermedia" and
pioneered "intermedia kinetic environments" in
art, theatre, and commerce, while also consulting for clients
such
as General Electric, Columbia Pictures, Scott Paper, The
Pentagon, and the White House.
In 1973, he formed Brockman, Inc., the international literary
and software agency specializing in serious nonfiction. He
is the founder of the nonprofit Edge Foundation, Inc. and
editor of Edge (www.edge.org), the highly acclaimed website
devoted to discussions of cutting edge science by many of
the world's brilliant thinkers, the leaders of what he has
termed "the third culture".
Included in his works as author and/or editor are By the
Late John Brockman, The Third Culture, Digerati:
Encounters with the Cyber Elite;editor of The Greatest
Inventions in the Past Two Thousand Years, and The
Next Fifty Years : Science in the First Half of the Twenty-First
Century; Science at the Edge.
Brockman has the distinction of being the only person to have
been profiled on Page One of both The New York Sunday
Times "Arts & Leisure" (1966), and The
New York Times "Science Times" (1997).
|
"A
New Scientific Synthesis of Human History "
Jared Diamond
Why
did human development proceed at such different rates on different
continents for the last 13,000 years? Historians tend to avoid
this subject like the plague, because of its apparently racist
overtones. Many people, or even most people, assume that the
answer involves biological differences in average IQ among
the world's populations, despite the fact that there is no
evidence for the existence of such IQ differences.?In case
the stink of racism still makes you feel uncomfortable about
exploring this subject, just reflect on the underlying reason
that so many people accept racist explanations of history's
broad pattern: We don't have a convincing alternative explanation.
Until we do, people will continue to gravitate by default
to racist theories. That leaves us with a huge moral gap,
which constitutes the strongest reason for tackling this uncomfortable
subject.
___________________________________________
JARED DIAMOND
is a professor of geography at UCLA, a MacArthur Fellow, winner
of the National Medal of Science, and author of The Third
Chimpanzee (awarded the British Science Book Prize and
a Los Angeles Times Book Prize) and the Pulitzer
Prize-winning Guns, Germs, and Steel.
|
"A
Biological Understanding of Human Nature"
Steven
Pinker
I
believe that there is a quasi-religious theory of human nature
prevalent among pundits and intellectuals which includes both
empirical assumptions about how the mind works and a set of
values that people hang on those assumptions. The theory has
three parts: [T]he Blank Slate—that we have no inherent
talents or temperaments because the mind is shaped completely
by the environment (parenting, culture, and society). The
second is the myth of the Noble Savage—that evil motives
are not inherent in people but spring from corrupting social
institutions. The third is the Ghost in the Machine—that
the most important part of us is somehow independent of our
biology, so that our ability to have experiences and make
choices can't be explained by our physiological makeup and
evolutionary history.
____________________________________________________
STEVEN PINKER,
an experimental psychologist, is Johnstone Family Professor
in the Department of Psychology at Harvard University, and
the author of, among other books, The Language Instinct,
How the Mind Works, Words and Rules, and most recently
The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature.
|
"Getting
Human Nature Right"
Helena Cronin
Certainly,
human nature is fixed. It's universal and unchanging, common
to every baby that's born, down through the history of our
species. But human behavior, which is generated by that nature,
is endlessly variable and diverse. After all, fixed rules
can give rise to an inexhaustible range of outcomes. Natural
selection equipped us with the fixed rules—the rules
that constitute our human nature. And it designed those rules
to generate behavior that's sensitive to the environment.
So, the answer to genetic determinism is simple. If you want
to change behavior, just change the environment. And to know
which changes would be appropriate and effective, you have
to know those Darwinian rules. You need only to understand
human nature, not to change it.
_________________________________
HELENA CRONIN
is a codirector of the London School of Economic's Centre
for Philosophy of Natural and Social Sciences, where she runs
the wide-ranging and successful program called Darwin@LSE,
which fosters research at the forefront of evolutionary theory.
She is the author of The Ant and the Peacock: Altruism
and Sexual Selection from Darwin to Today.
|
"Natural-Born
Cyborgs? "
Andy Clark
Our
brains are (by nature) unusually plastic; their biologically
proper functioning has always involved the recruitment and
exploitation of nonbiological props and scaffolds. More so
than any other creature on the planet, we humans emerge as
natural-born cyborgs, factory-tweaked and primed so as to
be ready to grow into extended cognitive and computational
architectures—ones whose systemic boundaries far exceed
those of skin and skull.
___________________________________________________
ANDY CLARK is professor
of philosophy and director of the cognitive science program
at Indiana University. He was previously professor of philosophy
at Sussex University, UK, and director of the Philosophy/
Neuroscience/ Psychology Program at Washington University
in St. Louis. He is the author of Microcognition: Philosophy,
Cognitive Science, and Parallel Distributed Processing; Associative
Engines; Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together
Again; Mindware: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Cognitive
Science; and Natural-Born Cyborgs.
|
"Animal
Minds"
Marc D. Hauser
In
my own work, we've begun looking at the kinds of computations
that animals and human infants are capable of when they interact
with the physical and social world. We want to understand
how such capacities evolved and how they constrain thought.
__________________________________________
MARC D. HAUSER
is a Harvard College Professor, professor of psychology at
Harvard University's Department of Psychology, and codirector
of the Mind, Brain, and Behavior Program. He is a recipient
of the National Science Foundation's Young Investigator Award,
and for several years, has been voted by Harvard students
as one of the most popular professors on campus. He is the
author of The Evolution of Communication, The Design of
Animal Communication, and Wild Minds.
|
"The
Evolution of Cooking"
Richard Wrangham
A
lot of people find it hard to live with the idea that we've
had a natural history of violence. But if we look at ourselves
an animal, it's clear that natural selection has favored emotions
in men that predispose them to enjoy competition, to enjoy
subordinating other men, to enjoy even killing other men.
These are difficult ideas to accept, and there are people
who argue that it's inappropriate to write about such ideas,
and they look for ways to undermine the evidence. What they
seem to fear is that once a biological component in our violent
behavior is recognized, then violence may be seen as inevitable.
______________________________________
RICHARD WRANGHAM
is a professor of biological anthropology at Harvard University
who studies chimpanzees in Uganda with an eye to illuminating
human evolution and behavior. One of Wrangham's central ideas
is that we should cherish the parallels between humans and
other great apes, because they help us to understand our own
behavior. "For all our self-consciousness, we humans continue
to follow biological rules," he notes. "Life is easier if
we understand those rules. Recognition of the deep contradictions
in humanity binds us to our past and also lights our future."
Wrangham is the author, with Dale Peterson, of Demonic
Males: Apes and the Origins of Human Violence.
|
"The
Computational Perspective"
Daniel C. Dennett
When
I go to a workshop or conference and give a talk, I'm actually
doing research, because the howls and screeches and frowns
that I get from people, the way in which they react to what
I suggest, is often diagnostic of how they are picturing the
problems in their own minds. And in fact people have very
different covert images about what the mind is and how the
mind works. The trick is to expose these images, to bring
them up into public view and then correct them. That's what
I specialize in.
__________________________
DANIEL C. DENNETT
is University Professor and Austin B. Fletcher Professor of
philosophy and Director of the Center for Cognitive Studies
at Tufts University. He is the author of, among other books,
Consciousness Explained, Darwin's Dangerous Idea,
Kinds of Minds, and, most recently, Freedom Evolves.
|
"What
Shape Are a German Shepherd's Ears?"
Stephen M. Kosslyn
There
is a gigantic project, yet to be done, that will root psychology
in the rest of natural science. Once this is accomplished,
you'll be able to go from phenomenology (things like mental
imagery) to information processing?to the brain?down through
the workings of the neurons, including the biochemistry, all
the way to the biophysics and the way that genes are up-regulated
and down-regulated. This is going to happen; I have no doubt
at all. When it does, we're going to have a vastly better
understanding of human nature than at any other time in human
history.
__________________________
STEPHEN M. KOSSLYN,
the John Lindsley Professor of Psychology at Harvard University,
has published over 250 papers on the nature of visual mental
imagery and related topics. He is a cofounder and senior editor
of the Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience and has served on
several National Research Council committees advising the
government on new technologies. His books include Image
and Mind; Ghosts in the Mind's Machine; Elements of Graph
Design; Wet Mind: The New Cognitive Neuroscience (with
Olivier Koenig); Image and Brain: The Resolution of the
Imagery Debate; and Psychology: The Brain, the Person, the
World (with Robin Rosenberg).
|
"Software
Is a Cultural Solvent"
Jordan
B. Pollack
I
work on developing an understanding of biological complexity
and how we can create it, because the limits of software engineering
have been clear now for two decades. The biggest programs
anyone can build are about 10 million lines of code. A real
biological object—a creature, an ecosystem, a brain—is
something with the same complexity as 10 billion lines of
code. And how do we get there?
______________________________________
JORDAN B. POLLACK
is a professor of computer science and complex systems at
Brandeis University. His laboratory's work on AI, artificial
life, neural networks, evolution, dynamical systems, games,
robotics, machine learning, and educational technology has
been reported on by the New York Times, Time, Science,
NPR, and other media sources worldwide. Pollack is a
prolific inventor, advises several start up companies, and
in his spare time runs Thinmail, which makes software to enhance
e-mail and wireless telephone communications.
|
"The
Second Coming: a Manifesto"
David Gelernter
The
theme of the Second Age, now approaching, is that computing
transcends computers. Information will travel through a sea
of anonymous, interchangeable computers like a breeze through
tall grass. A desktop computer will be a scooped-out hole
in the beach, where information from the cybersphere wells
up like seawater.
________________________________________________
DAVID GELERNTER,
a professor of computer science at Yale University and chief
scientist at Mirror Worlds Technologies, is a leading figure
in the third generation of artificial intelligence researchers
and the inventor of a programming language called Linda, which
made it possible to link computers to work on a single problem.
He has since emerged as one of the seminal thinkers in the
field known as parallel, or distributed, computing. His books
include Mirror Worlds; The Muse in the Machine; 1939:
The Lost World of the Fair; and Judaism Beyond Words.
|
"Making
Living Systems"
Rodney Brooks
My midlife research
crisis has been to move away from looking at humanoid robots
and toward looking at the very simple question of what makes
something alive—what the organizing principles are that
go on inside living systems. In my lab at MIT, we're trying
to build robots that have properties of living systems that
robots haven't had before.
_____________________________________________
RODNEY BROOKS
is the director of the MIT Computer Science and Artificial
Intelligence Laboratory and Fujitsu Professor of Computer
Science at MIT. He is also the chairman and chief technical
officer of iRobot, a robotics company. He is the author of
Flesh and Machines and Cambrian Intelligence: The
Early History of the New A.I.
|
"Making
Minds"
Hans Moravec
Perhaps
programs that implement humanlike intelligence in a highly
abstract way are possible on existing computers, as AI traditionalists
imagine. Perhaps, as they also imagine, devising such programs
requires lifetimes of work by world-class geniuses. But it
may not be so easy.
__________________________________________________
HANS MORAVEC
is a principal research scientist in the Robotics Institute
of Carnegie Mellon University and the author of Mind Children:
The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence and Robot:
Mere Machine to Transcendent Mind.
|
"Quantum
Computation"
David Deutsch
For
me, the main application of the theory [of quantum computation]
is to change our sense of the nature of reality. Regardless
of its practical applications in the distant future, the really
important thing is the philosophical implications—epistemological
and metaphysical—and the implications for theoretical
physics itself. One of the most important implications is
one that we get before we even build the first qubit [quantum
bit]. The very structure of the theory forces upon us a view
of physical reality as a multiverse.
_____________________________________________
DAVID
DEUTSCH's papers on quantum computation laid the foundations
for that field, breaking new ground both in physics and the
theory of computation and triggering an explosion of research
efforts worldwide. His work revealed the importance of quantum
effects in the physics of time travel, and he is the most
prominent contemporary researcher in the quantum theory of
parallel universes. In 1998, he was awarded the Paul Dirac
Prize by Britain's Institute of Physics "for pioneering work
in quantum computation leading to the concept of a quantum
computer and for contributing to the understanding of how
such devices might be constructed from quantum logic gates
in quantum networks." He is a founding member of the Centre
for Quantum Computation at the Clarendon Laboratory, University
of Oxford, and the author of The Fabric of Reality.
|
"What
Comes After Minds"
Marvin Minsky
Tens
of thousands of researchers today, in the field called artificial
intelligence, are striving to endow machines with?humanlike
abilities. They've developed programs that outperform people
in many specialized domains. Some solve hard mathematical
problems or skillfully pilot ships and planes. Others can
recognize voices and faces or objects on assembly lines. But
none of them yet can dress themselves, or understand the sorts
of things that young children can. Why don't any computers
yet have what we call everyday, commonsense knowledge or do
the sorts of reasoning that we regard as obvious?
_____________________________________________
MARVIN
MINSKY is Toshiba Professor of Media
Arts and Sciences and professor of electrical engineering
and computer science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
His research has led to both theoretical and practical advances
in mathematics, computer science, physics, psychology, and
artificial intelligence, with notable contributions in the
domains of computational semantics and knowledge representation,
machine perception and learning, and theories of human problem
solving. Minsky is also the inventor of the popular Confocal
Scanning Microscope, which revolutionized our ability to see
dense microscopic structures. He is the author of The
Society of Mind and the forthcoming book, The Emotion
Machine.
|
"The
Singularity "
Ray Kurzweil
We
are entering a new era. I call it the Singularity. It's a
merger between human intelligence and machine intelligence
which is going to create something bigger than itself. It's
the cutting edge of evolution on our planet. One can make
a strong case that it's actually the cutting edge of the evolution
of intelligence in general, because there's no indication
that it has occurred anywhere else. To me that is what human
civilization is all about. It is part of our destiny, and
part of the destiny of evolution, to continue to progress
ever faster and to grow the power of intelligence exponentially.
______________________________________
RAY KURZWEIL
is an inventor, entrepreneur, and author. He was the principal
developer of (among a host of other inventions) the first
omni-font optical character recognition software, the first
print-to-speech reading machine for the blind, the first CCD
flatbed scanner, the first text-to-speech synthesizer, the
first music synthesizer capable of re-creating the grand piano
and other orchestral instruments, and the first commercially
marketed large vocabulary speech recognition system. He received
the National Medal of Technology from President Clinton in
1999. He is the author of The Age of Intelligent Machines
and the national best-seller The Age of Spiritual Machines:
When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence.
|
"One
Half of a Manifesto"
Jaron Lanier
We
imagine "pure" cybernetic systems, but we can prove only
that we know how to build fairly dysfunctional ones. We kid
ourselves
when we think we understand something, even a computer, merely
because we can model or digitize it.
_______________________________________
JARON LANIER is
a computer scientist, composer, and visual artist, probably
best known for his work in Virtual Reality, a term he coined.
Until recently, he was the lead scientist of the National
Tele-immersion Initiative, a coalition of research universities
studying advanced applications for Internet 2. His current
research interests include real-time remote terascale processing,
autostereo methods, and haptics.
|
"How
Fast, How Small, How Powerful? Moore's Law and the Ultimate
Laptop "
Seth Lloyd
Now we have created devices called computers, which can register
and process huge amounts of information—a significant
fraction of the amount of information that human beings themselves,
as a species, can process. When I think of all the information
being processed in that way?I see our species at a very interesting
point in its history, which is the point at which our artifacts
will soon be processing more information than we physically
will be able to process.
__________________________________________
SETH LLOYD is an
associate professor of mechanical engineering at MIT and a
principal investigator at MIT's Research Laboratory of Electronics.
He works on problems having to do with information and complex
systems, from the very small (How do atoms process information?
How can you make them compute?) to the very large (How does
society process information? And how can we understand society
in terms of its ability to process information?).
|
"A
Golden Age of Cosmology"
Alan Guth
The
classical theory was never really a theory of a bang; it was
a theory about the aftermath of a bang. It started with all
of the matter in the universe already in place, already undergoing
rapid expansion, already incredibly hot. There was no explanation
of how the universe got that way. Inflation is an attempt
to answer the question of what made the universe bang, and
now it looks as though it's almost certainly the right answer.
________________________________________
ALAN GUTH, the father
of the inflationary theory of the universe, is the Victor
F. Weisskopf Professor of Physics at MIT. His research interests
are in the area of elementary particle theory and the application
of particle theory to the early universe. In 2002 he was awarded
the Dirac Medal of the International Centre for Theoretical
Physics, along with Paul Steinhardt and Andrei Linde, for
the development of the concept of inflation in cosmology.
He is the author of The Inflationary Universe: The Quest
for a New Theory of Cosmic Origins.
|
"The
Cyclic Universe"
Paul Steinhardt
[F]or
the past year I've been involved in the development of an
alternative theory that turns cosmic history topsy-turvy.
In it, all the events that created the important features
of our universe occur in a different order, by different physics,
at different times, over different time scales—and yet
this model seems capable of reproducing all of the successful
predictions of the consensus picture with the same exquisite
detail.
________________________________________
PAUL STEINHARDT
is the Albert Einstein Professor in Science and a professor
in both the Department of Physics and the Department of Astrophysical
Sciences at Princeton University. He is one of the leading
theorists responsible for inflationary theory, having been
involved in constructing the first workable model of inflation
and the theory of how inflation could produce seeds for galaxy
formation. He was also among the first to show evidence for
dark energy and cosmic acceleration, introducing the term
"quintessence" to refer to dynamical forms of dark energy.
In 2002 he was awarded the Dirac Medal of the International
Centre for Theoretical Physics, along with Alan Guth and Andrei
Linde, for the development of the concept of inflation in
cosmology.
|
"Theories
of the Brane"
Lisa Randall
Additional
spatial dimensions may seem like a wild and crazy idea at
first, but there are powerful reasons to believe that there
really are extra dimensions of space. One reason resides in
string theory, in which it is postulated that the particles
are not themselves fundamental but are oscillation modes of
a fundamental string.
______________________________________________
LISA RANDALL
is a professor of physics at Harvard University, where she
also earned her PhD (1987). She was a President's Fellow at
the University of California at Berkeley, a postdoctoral fellow
at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, and a junior fellow at Harvard
before joining the MIT faculty in 1991. Between 1998 and 2000,
she had a joint appointment at Princeton and MIT as a full
professor, and she moved to Harvard as a full professor in
2001. Her research in theoretical high energy physics is primarily
related to exploring the physics underlying the standard model
of particle physics. This has involved studies of supersymmetry
and, most recently, extra dimensions of space.
|
"Loop
Quantum Gravity"
Lee Smolin
It's
only since the middle 1980s that real progress began to be
made on unifying relativity and quantum theory. The turning
point was the invention of not one but two approaches: loop
quantum gravity and string theory. Since then, we have been
making steady progress on both of these approaches. In each
case, we are able to do calculations that predict surprising
new phenomena. Still, we are not done. Neither is yet in final
form; there are still things to understand. But the really
important news is that there is now a real chance of doing
experiments that will test the new predictions of these theories.
This is important, because we're in the uncomfortable situation
of having two well- developed candidates for the quantum theory
of gravity. We need to reduce these to one theory. We can
do this either by finding that one is wrong and the other
right, or by finding that the two theories can themselves
be unified.
___________________________________________
LEE SMOLIN is
a founding member and research physicist at the Perimeter
Institute for Theoretical Physics, in Waterloo, Ontario. A
prominent contributor to the subject of quantum gravity, he
is also the author of The Life of the Cosmos and Three
Roads to Quantum Gravity.
|
"A
Look Ahead"
Martin Rees
The
challenge is to understand how complexity emerges. This is
just as fundamental as the challenge to come up with the so-called
theory of everything—and it is independent of it. The
theoretical physicist Steven Weinberg says that if you go
on asking "Why?why?why?" you get back to a question in particle
physics or cosmology. That's true to a degree, but only in
a limited sense.
_____________________________________________
SIR
MARTIN REES is Royal Society Professor at Cambridge University,
a fellow of Kings College, and the U.K.'s Astronomer Royal.
He was previously Plumian Professor of Astronomy and Experimental
Philosophy at Cambridge, having been elected to this chair
at the age of thirty, succeeding Fred Hoyle. He is the author
of several books, including Gravity's Fatal Attraction
(with Mitchell Begelman); Before the Beginning; Just
Six Numbers; Our Cosmic Habitat; and Our
Final Hour: A Scientist's Warning: How Terror, Error, and
Environmental Disaster Threaten Humankind's Future In This
Century—On Earth and Beyond.
|
Epilog
Responses to "The New Humanists"
Nicholas
Humphrey, Jaron Lanier, Joseph LeDoux, John Horgan, Timothy
Taylor, Carlo Rovelli, Steven Johnson, Lee Smolin, Douglas
Rushkoff, Piet Hut, Marc D. Hauser, Mihalyi Csikzentmihalyi,
Denis Dutton, Daniel C. Dennett, Howard Rheingold, Chris Anderson
|
| |