JB: What happened after you had your epiphany?
BROOKS: We built our first robot, and it worked fantastically well. At the
time there were just a very few mobile robots in the world; they all
assumed a static environment, they would do some sensing, they would
compute for 15 minutes, move a couple of feet, do some sensing, compute for
15 minutes, etc., and that on a mainframe computer. Our system ran on a
tiny processor on board. The first day we switched it on the robot wandered
around without hitting anything, people walked up to it, it avoided them,
so immediately it was in a dynamic environment. We got all that for free,
and this system was operating fantastically better than the conventional
systems. But the reaction was that "this can't be right!" I gave the first
talk on this at a robotics seminar held in Chantilly, France, and I've
heard since that Georges Giralt head of robotics in France , and Ruzena
Basczy, who at the time was head of the computer science department at the
University of Pennsylvania, were sitting at the back of the room saying to
each other, "what is this young boy doing, throwing away his career?" They
have told me since that they thought I was nuts. They thought I'd gone off
the deep end because I threw out all the mathematical modeling, all the
geometric reconstruction by saying you can do it directly, connecting
sensors to actuators. I had videotape showing the thing working better than
any other robot at the time. But the reaction was, it can't be right. It's
a parlor trick, this won't work anywhere else, this is just a one-shot
thing.
JB: What do biologists think?
BROOKS: Largely the reaction from biologists and ethologists is that this
is obvious, this is the way to do it, how could anyone have thought to do
it differently? I had my strongest support early on from biologists and
ethologists. Now it's become mainstream in the following weak sense. The
new classical AI approach is, you've got this Brooks-like going on down at
the bottom, and then you have the standard old AI system sitting on top
modulating its behavior. Before there was the standard AI system
controlling everything; now this new stuff has crept in below. Of course, I
say that you just have this new stuff, and nothing else. The standard
methodology is you have both right now. So everyone uses my approach, or
some variation, at the bottom level now. Pathfinder on Mars is using that
at the bottom level. I want to push this all the way, and people are sort
of holding onto the old approach on top of it, because that's what they
know how to deal with.
JB: Where is this going to go?
BROOKS: Certainly these approaches are going to get out there into the
real world, and will be in consumer products within a very small number of
years. And it's going to come through the toy industry because that's
already happening.
JB: What kind of consumer applications?
BROOKS: Things that appear frivolous. Let me give you an analogy on the
frivolousness of things. Imagine you've got a time machine and you go back
to the Moore School, University of Pennsylvania, around 1950, and they've
spent 4 million dollars in four years and they've got Eniac working. And
you say, by the way, in less than fifty years you'll be able to buy a
computer with the equivalent power to this for 40 cents. The engineers
would look at you like you were crazy, this whole thing with 18,000 vacuum
tubes, for 40 cents? Then if they asked you what will people use these
computers for? You say "Oh, to tell the time." Totally frivolous. How could
you be so crazy as to have such a thing of complexity, such a tool telling
the time. It's the same thing in consumer products. What it relies on is
getting a variety of components that you can plug together to rapidly build
up many different frivoulous products, by just adding a little bit of
bottom up intelligence. For instance, one component is being able to track
where a person is. With that you can have a thing that knows where you are
in the room and dynamically adjusts the balance in your stereo system for
you. If you're in the room you always have perfect stereo. Or it's attached
to a motor and it's a vanity mirror that follows you around in the
bathroom, so it's always at exactly the right angle for you to see your
face. For kids they can set up a guard for their bedroom such that when
someone comes by it shoots them with a water pistol. Once the components
are available there'll be lots of other frivolous applications. But that's
what's going to be what's there and what people will buy.
|